top of page

Mistrial declared in case of students charged after Stanford pro-Palestinian protests

A mistrial was declared in Santa Clara County Superior Court after a deadlocked jury failed to reach a verdict against five current and former Stanford University students charged over a 2024 pro-Palestinian protest that allegedly caused extensive damage to the campus president’s office. Prosecutors are seeking a new trial as the case remains one of the most serious tied to last year’s nationwide campus demonstrations.

Kanishka Singh Reuters

​

​

February 14, 2026

Mistrial declared in case of students charged after Stanford pro-Palestinian protests

FILE PHOTO: A student attends an event at a protest encampment in support of Palestinians at Stanford University during the ongoing conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Islamist group Hamas, in Stanford, California U.S., April 26, 2024.

Carlos Barria/Reuters

A judge declared a mistrial on Friday in a case of five current and former Stanford University students related to the 2024 pro-Palestinian protests when demonstrators barricaded themselves inside the school president's office.


Twelve protesters were initially charged last year with felony vandalism, according to prosecutors who said at least one suspect entered the building by breaking a window. Police arrested 13 people on June 5, 2024, in relation to the incident and the university said the building underwent "extensive" damage.


The case was tried in Santa Clara County Superior Court against five defendants charged with felony vandalism and felony conspiracy to trespass. The rest previously accepted plea deals or diversion programs.


The jury was deadlocked. It voted nine to three to convict on the felony charge of vandalism and eight to four to convict on the felony charge to trespass. Jurors failed to reach a verdict after deliberations.


The charges were among the most serious against participants in the 2024 pro-Palestinian protest movement on U.S. colleges in which demonstrators demanded an end to Israel's war in Gaza and Washington's support for its ally along with a divestment of funds by their universities from companies supporting Israel.


Prosecutors in the case said the defendants engaged in unlawful property destruction.


"This case is about a group of people who destroyed someone else's property and caused hundreds of thousands of dollars in damage. That is against the law," Santa Clara County District Attorney Jeff Rosen said in a statement, adding he sought a new trial.


Anthony Brass, a lawyer for one of the protesters, told the New York Times his side was not defending lawlessness but "the concept of transparency and ethical investment."


"This is a win for these young people of conscience and a win for free speech," Brass said, adding "humanitarian activism has no place in a criminal courtroom."


Protesters had renamed the building "Dr. Adnan's Office" after Adnan Al-Bursh, a Palestinian doctor who died in an Israeli prison after months of detention.


Over 3,000 were arrested during the 2024 U.S. pro-Palestinian protest movement, according to media tallies. Some students faced suspension, expulsion and degree revocation.

-Kanishka Singh/Reuters

TOP POLITICAL STORIES

 Trump sets 2026 deadline to end US military aid to Israel

Trump sets 2026 deadline to end US military aid to Israel

Iran-US deal remains elusive despite diplomatic efforts, Iranian official says

Iran-US deal remains elusive despite diplomatic efforts, Iranian official says

Russia claims strike on Ukrainian power facilities in massive overnight attack

Russia claims strike on Ukrainian power facilities in massive overnight attack

LATEST NEWS

Businessman killed, 2 suspects arrested over Marawi land dispute shooting

Businessman killed, 2 suspects arrested over Marawi land dispute shooting

Brazil urges action on climate goals as COP30 wraps up

Brazil urges action on climate goals as COP30 wraps up

UK court clears MI5 of contempt proceedings over misleading evidence

UK court clears MI5 of contempt proceedings over misleading evidence

bottom of page