top of page

EXPLAINER: Why are Poland and Ukraine at odds about their history?

Poland and Ukraine’s alliance has been strained after Kyiv named a military unit after the Ukrainian Insurgent Army, a group linked in Polish memory to World War Two massacres. The dispute has reignited long-standing historical grievances and demands for accountability over wartime atrocities.

REUTERS

​

​

June 22, 2026

EXPLAINER: Why are Poland and Ukraine at odds about their history?

FILE PHOTO: A man holding a Polish national flag with coat of arms uses a phone at the site of a mass burial ceremony of Poles killed by Ukrainian nationalists during World War II, in the former Polish village of Puznyky, in Ternopil region, Ukraine September 6, 2025.

Anastasiia Smolienko/File Photo/Reuters

WARSAW — Despite Poland’s strong support for Ukraine in its war against Russia, relations between the two countries have been strained by a dispute over Kyiv’s decision to name a military unit after a nationalist force linked to wartime atrocities against Poles during World War II.


The disagreement has revived long-standing tensions over competing historical narratives, particularly surrounding the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA) and the Volhynia massacres.


Dispute over Ukrainian Insurgent Army reference


Tensions escalated after Polish President Karol Nawrocki revoked Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s top national honor following Kyiv’s decision to recognize a Ukrainian combat unit that adopted the name of the Ukrainian Insurgent Army.


The move, intended by Ukrainian forces to honor historical resistance to Moscow, was widely criticized in Poland due to the UPA’s controversial wartime record.


The Ukrainian Insurgent Army operated during and after World War II, when Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union. The group at times fought against Soviet forces and also cooperated with Nazi Germany in pursuit of Ukrainian independence.


Ukraine has said the naming carries no anti-Polish intent and reflects the legacy of fighters who resisted Russian domination.


However, Polish officials and historians emphasize the UPA’s role in the Volhynia massacres between 1943 and 1945, during which Warsaw estimates that around 100,000 ethnic Poles were killed. Thousands of Ukrainians were also killed in retaliatory violence.


Polish historians describe the killings as genocide aimed at securing ethnic dominance in disputed territories that had belonged to Poland between the two world wars. Kyiv rejects that characterization, arguing the conflict was complex and involved atrocities committed on both sides.


Long-running historical grievances


The dispute has persisted for decades, even as Poland has been one of Ukraine’s most important allies since Russia’s full-scale invasion, providing military assistance and hosting nearly one million Ukrainian refugees.


Post-war population transfers continue to shape historical grievances. In 1947, within Poland’s new postwar borders, approximately 140,000 ethnic Ukrainians and Lemkos were forcibly relocated from southeastern Poland to former German territories. Warsaw describes the operation as a security measure to weaken UPA support networks, while Ukrainian perspectives often view it as ethnic cleansing.


Exhumation requests and renewed tensions


Poland has repeatedly sought access to burial sites in western Ukraine linked to the Volhynia massacres. Progress on these requests has been limited, though recent developments suggest cautious movement.


Poland recently began exhumations in the former village of Puzhnyky, while Kyiv last week approved additional excavation work in the Volhynia region’s Liuboml district.


Rising nationalist rhetoric in Poland


The dispute has also been amplified by domestic politics in Poland. Nawrocki, a conservative historian and nationalist figure inspired by former U.S. President Donald Trump, has accused Kyiv of delaying exhumation permissions and has called for Ukraine to formally recognize the Volhynia killings as genocide.


During his political campaign, Nawrocki also took a harder line on Ukraine’s future NATO ambitions, saying he would not support ratification of Ukrainian accession if it risked escalating tensions with Russia, marking a departure from Poland’s previous policy consensus.


Critics argue that his stance reflects a broader attempt to reshape historical education in Poland in ways that downplay more difficult aspects of the country’s past.


Despite these tensions, both Warsaw and Kyiv continue to maintain strategic cooperation, underscoring the complex balance between historical grievances and present-day security concerns in Eastern Europe. -Reporting by Marek Strzelecki; additional reporting by Anna Wlodarczak-Semczuk; Editing by Kevin Liffey and Milla Nissi-Prussak/Reuters

TOP POLITICAL STORIES

Hong Kong condemns countries criticizing ruling on student activist Joshua Wong

Hong Kong condemns countries criticizing ruling on student activist Joshua Wong

After months of naval blockade, US now looks to restrict Iran's land commerce

After months of naval blockade, US now looks to restrict Iran's land commerce

Senator Padilla  envies Senator Dela Rosa for being wanted by ICC

Senator Padilla envies Senator Dela Rosa for being wanted by ICC

LATEST NEWS

Pope Leo urges South Americans to bridge divisions between their countries

Pope Leo urges South Americans to bridge divisions between their countries

Heavy rain floods tents of displaced people in Gaza

Heavy rain floods tents of displaced people in Gaza

2026 ASEAN Summit in Manila: Angelina Jolie to talk on global humanitarian action

2026 ASEAN Summit in Manila: Angelina Jolie to talk on global humanitarian action

bottom of page